I have been using “cf.” incorrectly for years.
Share
Access
Index
- announcement
- art
- big question
- bourgeois
- confession
- consumer reporting
- cute
- education
- empirical observations
- ethical dilemma
- event
- film
- fine cuisine
- gossip
- health
- hermeneutics
- history
- hope for the future
- Leviathan
- manners
- meaningful labor
- memory
- music
- novels
- performance
- poems
- procrastination
- promises
- psychology
- reading
- revaluation
- review
- solidarity
- The Confessions (St. Augustine)
- stories
- technoia
- The Creation of the American Republic
- The Golden Bowl
- The Human Condition
- The Portrait of a Lady
- the state apparatus
- the sublime
- vive le résistance
- writing
god, how I hate the Chicago manual
by Scott—Feb 9, 03:26 PM
No way! It’s brilliant. It has teh answrz for EVERYTHING.
by greg—Feb 9, 03:42 PM
akshully, it doesn’t!
by kl—Feb 9, 04:25 PM
Yeah, what she said. I just hate having to learn a new form of anything. And I can never keep the bibliography, notes and references stuff straight.
by Scott—Feb 10, 02:11 PM
Don’t become a reference librarian, lazy.
by greg—Feb 10, 02:18 PM
But how, pray tell, have you been using cf.?
by laura—Feb 13, 09:43 PM
I have been using it as if it meant “cross-reference,” as synonym for “see.” But as I discovered in CMS when looking up something else entirely (as is usually the case in such things): “[use] cf. only to mean ‘compare’ or ‘see, by way of comparison.’”
by greg—Feb 14, 12:07 AM
I have been using cf. for many years, correctly, it seems, but I just got it from copying my parents. I used their books quite a bit in college and acquired the same habit of penciling notes in the margins.
by laura—Feb 14, 12:05 PM